![]() It would be ideal to also cover Windows XP with that card. I'm in the process to buy a Radeon of the 2nd, 3rd or 4th generation GCN architecture primarily for use in Linux. Sure that hardware would be the "best" if better means faster, but there could be diminishing returns after a certain point. So basically games rom around 2004-2010, afaik the high time of XPĬould run some tests with mx Xeon/660 Ti rig as well (got XP and 7 on it and could also throw in a HD4870 for good measure)Īll that mainly to see how reasonable it would be to go with a combination of XP and hardware after 2010-2012. Would suggest stuff like BF2, Fallout 3/NV, Oblivion, Skyrim, Crysis (high preset, because oficially "very high" isnt supported under XP), Far Cry 1/2, Stalker, Half Life 2. (Like Aquamark3 which scores higher under XP, but the HWbot wrapper changes that alot to almost identical results) Would make more sense to test in actual games, maybe even compare how they perform compared to 7/8/10 on the same hardware while at it.Įspecially games (and benchmarks) that aren't from the really late XP era. Or rather put the i5 higher, because that is clearly a CPU limitation (see my results with the 1060 and 660 Ti, the later got 2000 more just because of 200 MHz on the CPU.) Guess it's time to put that 780 under water. That is quite a nice result, but the step up from weaker hardware isn't that great:įilename Clipboard03.png File size 77.42 KiB Views 2433 views File comment added more to the list File license Fair use/fair dealing exception It will load the card but you reboot and the card will come up "Windows has stopped this device because it has reported a problem" and it never loads. I've tried this with other maxwell cards (tried a friend's GTX 980), the drivers will not work even if you add it to the ini file. Technically GTX TItan-X Maxwell supports Xp, if you add the card to the ini file it will be detected and should work Technically GTX TItan-X Maxwell supports Xp, if you add the card to the ini file it will be detected and should work Reply 105 of 232, by agent_x007 plus my 2500K system is a pain in the ass and would have to be completely disassembled and motherboard removed to fit a second card, so would like to know if it works some how before "going down that road". I don't really want to spend another $200 on a whim in case it doesn't work. ![]() If we're chasing down the absoultely fastest possible graphics setup for XP, then this might be useful info. ![]() I've heard someone rumored that it should be possible, but I haven't heard of anyone actually doing it. I would like to know if anyone's been able to enable SLI With nvidia 700 series under XP-32 and has it working. Supposedly these GTX 780 Classified cards (mine came at 86% ASIC quality) can do 1500 mhz core on a water loop, but I can't find a water block for it yet. The only point of reference is some random website reviews that ran other cards like the 780 Ti and titan black and 970's through 3dmark 2006 and found my 780 in this system slots in between the 970 and 980 cards. And I picked up one off ebay for $180 and got it here and tuned it's bios myself and have it clocked at 1268 core and 1900 mhz (7600 effective) memory and mated it with my Z77 gigabyte board and a i5-2500K 5.1 ghz and it's now my system that dual boots XP and Vista64. Then I found out that EVGA hand-binned all of the GTX 780 classified cards to at least 80% or higher ASIC Quality and they all overclock to the moon with a tuned bios. At first I figured it was the nvidia 700 series. I guess it's time to comment I did come up with the fastest XP video card. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |